Shattles v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Cynthia Shattles
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 1:2009cv00761
Filed: May 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Rapides
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Presiding Judge: James D Kirk
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations of the magistrate judge. ORDERED the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and the appeal is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 09/27/2010. (crt,Leleux, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shattles v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Shattles
Represented By: William J Ziegler, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?