Carlile v. Jackson Brace & Limb Co
Plaintiff: Karen Carlile
Defendant: Jackson Brace & Limb Co
Case Number: 1:2009cv01038
Filed: June 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Winn
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Presiding Judge: James D Kirk
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction RECOMMENDING that the motion be GRANTED DISMISSING Carlile's claims against defendant. Objections to R&R due by 9/3/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge James D Kirk on 08/17/09. (crt,Burge, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlile v. Jackson Brace & Limb Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Carlile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson Brace & Limb Co
Represented By: Thomas M Hayes, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?