Warnstedt v. Crittle et al
Andrew Harold Warnstedt |
Mike Crittle, Williams, Brandon Willis, Ricardo Marques, W Ryder, Chris Smith, Joe Keffer, Gregory G Maldonado, Herrell Watts and Harley G Lappin |
1:2009cv01472 |
August 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Alexandria Office |
Grant |
Dee D Drell |
James D Kirk |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 48 Report and Recommendations GRANTING 46 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Mike Crittle DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE plaintiff's claims. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 07/21/11. (crt,Burge, J) |
Filing 14 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations of the magistrate judge. ORDERED petitioner's complaint be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and failing to state a claim for which relief can be granted except for plaintiff's eighth amendment claim against Mike Crittle. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 03/23/2010. (crt,Leleux, M) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint RECOMMENDING that Warnstedt's complaint be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii), EXCEPT FOR WARNSTEDT'S EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM AGAINST MIKE CRITTLE, WHICH WILL BE SERVED ON THAT DEFENDANT. Objections to R&R due by 2/18/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge James D Kirk on 02/01/10. (crt,Burge, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.