Davis v. Keffer et al
David Davis |
Joe Keffer, Tony Wingo, Brad Eskridge, S Grant, J McKinney, Mike Crittle, Kevin Montgomery and Christal Zerr |
1:2009cv02005 |
November 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Alexandria Office |
Grant |
Dee D Drell |
James D Kirk |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 33 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Kevin Montgomery, S Grant, J McKinney, Mike Crittle, Tony Wingo, Joe Keffer, Brad Eskridge, Christal Zerr, 41 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment 33 is GRANTED and that Davis' action is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 11/3/10. (crt,Roaix, G) |
Filing 14 JUDGMENT re 6 Report and Recommendation: ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is not adopted at this time. There are a sufficient number of inconsistencies raised in the objections to warrant service of this suit and a response by defendants. The matter is REFERRED back to Magistrate James D. Kirk for further proceedings consistent herewith. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 03/24/10. (crt,Harrison, U) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint RECOMMENDING that Davis' complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915 and 1915A. Objections to R&R due by 2/26/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge James D Kirk on 02/09/10. (crt,Burge, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.