Louisiana College v. Sebelius et al
| Louisiana College |
| Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda L Solis, Timothy Geithner, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, U S Dept of Labor and U S Dept of Treasury |
| 1:2012cv00463 |
| February 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Alexandria Office |
| Caddo |
| Dee D Drell |
| James D Kirk |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM RULING re 123 MOTION for Declaratory Judgment filed by Louisiana College, 123 MOTION for Permanent Injunction filed by Louisiana College. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 3/12/2019. (crt,Bunting, M)
|
|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM RULING re 81 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by U S Dept of Labor, Timothy Geithner, Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda L Solis, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, U S Dept of Treasury, 91 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Louisiana College. Signed by Chief Judge Dee D Drell on 08/13/14. (crt,Burge, J)
|
|
Filing
43
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 34 Report and Recommendations; denying as MOOT 18 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants may file a motion to dismiss pertaining to the amended complaint if warranted. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 07/26/12. (crt,Guillot, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
