Davis v. James
Plaintiff: Roger D. Davis, Jr.
Defendant: Laurie Whitten James
Case Number: 1:2012cv01029
Filed: April 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Alexandria Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: James D Kirk
Presiding Judge: James T Trimble
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights complaint be DENIED AND DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted 28 U.S. C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 1/8/13. (crt,Roaix, G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger D. Davis, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laurie Whitten James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?