Shivers v. Lard et al
| Darren D Shivers |
| Mona Heyse, Pam Horn, Marlan Moss, McDonald, Lard, Brenda Smiley and Correctional Corporate of America |
| 1:2013cv02406 |
| July 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Alexandria Office |
| Winn |
| Dee D Drell |
| James D Kirk |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
JUDGMENT; adopting re 68 Report and Recommendations denying 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment and that Shivers' action against McDonald is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS ORDERED that a summary ju dgment is GRANTED in favor of Lard and Moss, and that Shivers' against Lard and Moss is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS ORDERED that Shivers' complaint against Corrections Corporation of America is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 1/7/15. (crt,Roaix, G)
|
|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Shivers' complaint be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A as to DEFENDANTS PAM HORN, MONA HEYSE and BRENDA SMILEY ONLY. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this Judgment to the keeper of the three strikes list. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 03/13/14. (crt,Burge, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
