Edwards v. Turner et al
Gabriel Michael Edwards |
Darrell Turner, Donny Cartrette, Michael Melton, Kim Askcarlton, Unknown Medical Employees and Unknown Employees |
1:2013cv02416 |
August 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Alexandria Office |
Grant |
Dee D Drell |
James D Kirk |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 ORDER adopting in part 62 Report and Recommendations; granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims by Plaintiff against Defendants Jones, Rhodes, Lawson and Watson for deliberate indifference to serious medical need are DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 1/27/15. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 64 ORDER denying 30 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision re 28 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 11/25/2014. (crt,Williams, L) |
Filing 17 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations re 1 Complaint, as 7 Amended. Plaintiff's complaint be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A except (1) Plaintiff's excessive force and retaliation claims against Darrell Turner and (2) the medical care claim against Lt. Jones, Lt. Lawson, Counselor Watson, and Mrs. Rhodes. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 03/13/14. (crt,Guillot, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.