Preston v. Ask-Carlson
Plaintiff: Marcus De Andre Preston
Defendant: K Ask-Carlson
Case Number: 1:2013cv03006
Filed: November 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Grant
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Presiding Judge: James D Kirk
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT adopting 2 Report and Recommendations re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Section 2241 application be and is hereby DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 03/13/14. (crt,Guillot, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Preston v. Ask-Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus De Andre Preston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K Ask-Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?