Wooley v. Patterson et al
| Alan Wooley |
| M D Carvajal, Willie Vasquez, Cornell Dean, Lee Stewart, Jones Wilson, Robert, Teri, Campbell, Sansher Corp, Dads Easy Spray, Lowes, Unknown Contractor and Charles Patterson |
| 1:2015cv00567 |
| March 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Alexandria Office |
| Grant |
| Dee D Drell |
| James D Kirk |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
JUDGMENT ADOPTING re 67 Report and Recommendations; granting 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 44 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss 44 is GRANTED IN PART and Wooley's action against Willie Vasquez is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss 44 is GRANTED IN PART and Wooley's action against Cornell Dean is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of exhaustion. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 4/14/2016. (crt,Bunting, M)
|
|
Filing
28
JUDGMENT ADOPTING Report and Recommendations re 25 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint be DENIED AND DISMISSED pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2)(b) and Section 1915A, except Plaintiff's medical care claim against Willie Vasquez and Cornell Dean. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 8/26/2015. (crt,Bunting, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
