Culp v. Alexandre et al
| Marvell Antonio Culp |
| Joel Alexandre, Dandan He, S Pennison, Jacinda Fruge, Alex Horton, C Reimer, N Smack, J Smith, Willie Vasquez, M Carbo, Maxwell Dunbar, K Williams, A Watson and N Ashli |
| 1:2016cv01267 |
| August 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Alexandria Office |
| Grant |
| Dee D Drell |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
JUDGMENT adopting 84 Report and Recommendations; granting 70 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying as moot 65 Motion to Compel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Culps action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 4/17/2019. (crt,Bray, K)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 61 Motion to Appoint Expert Witness. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 6/13/2018. (crt,Haik, K)
|
|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT adopting 41 Report and Recommendations: IT IS ORDERED that 30 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART to the extent it seeks dismissal of all constitutional tort claims, misrepresentation claims, and claims against independent contractors. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 30 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED IN PART to the extent it seeks dismissal of negligence claims. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 1/22/2018. (crt,Williams, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
