Osborn v. Tanner

Plaintiff: Jeremy Osborn
Defendant: Robert Tanner
Case Number: 1:2016cv01587
Filed: November 14, 2016
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Natchitoches
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Referring Judge: Joseph H L Perez-Montes
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 7, 2017 12 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendations re 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jeremy Osborn. IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by the one year limitations period codified at § 2244(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 3/7/2017. (crt,Keifer, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osborn v. Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremy Osborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?