Robinson v. Slay et al
Darrin Robinson |
Captain Dewy, Major Bordelon, Major Mattie, Colonel Tieser, Emmitt Duplechain, Casey McVea and Rodney Slay |
1:2018cv00966 |
July 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Alexandria Office |
Avoyelles |
Dee D Drell |
Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE Assigned to Judge Dee D Drell and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 2 DEFICIENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darrin Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) . Application not on approved forms. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bordelon, Dewy, Emmitt Duplechain, Mattie, Casey McVea, Rodney Slay, Tieser with Jury Demand filed by Darrin Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit - Part 1, #3 Exhibit - Part 2, #4 Letter, #5 Proposed summons/writ, #6 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Darrin Robinson. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY as relief sought included within pdf of 1 Complaint. (crt,Miletello, A) Modified on 7/24/2018 to assign document number (Miletello, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.