Anekwu v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
Henry C Anekwu, Henary Anekwu and Henery Anekwu |
Kirstjen M Nielsen, U S Government, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, David Rivera and Matt Whitaker |
1:2018cv01567 |
November 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Dee D Drell |
Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Henry C Anekwu in the amount of $400.00, receipt number 54635060578. (crt,Delgado, S) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 12/4/2018. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Dee D Drell and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Henry C Anekwu. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY as motion is contained within relief of complaint. (crt,Miletello, A) Modified on 11/30/2018 to assign document number (Miletello, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.