Stalnaker v. Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C et al
| Brandi Stalnaker |
| Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C, LA Dept of Environmental Quality, Baker Hughes Holdings L L C and Dresser L L C |
| 1:2020cv01292 |
| October 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| David C Joseph |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 First MOTION to Remand, MOTION for Attorney Fees Reply to Defendants' Response filed by Brandi Stalnaker. (aty,Doggett, Kenneth) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 First MOTION to Remand, MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C, Dresser L L C. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(aty,Stakelum, Andrew) |
| STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. Dresser L L C answer due 10/9/2020; LA Dept of Environmental Quality answer due 10/9/2020. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY; see pdf document, Attachment #2 to #8 Response to Removal Order. (crt,Dauterive, C) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C, Dresser L L C . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(aty,Stakelum, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C, Dresser L L C identifying Corporate Parents GE Oil & Gas US Holdings I, Inc, Baker Hughes Company, EHHC NewCO LLC, Baker Hughes Holdings LLC for Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C; Corporate Parent Baker Hughes Holdings LLC for Dresser L L C. (aty,Stakelum, Andrew) Modified on 10/16/2020 to modify docket text(Miletello, A). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #5 First MOTION to Remand, MOTION for Attorney Fees. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Dauterive, C) |
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Remand and Memorandum in Support, MOTION for Attorney Fees by Brandi Stalnaker. Motions referred to Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 10/13/2020. (aty,Doggett, Kenneth). Added MOTION for Attorney Fees on 10/14/2020 (Dauterive, C). Modified on 10/14/2020 to edit text (Dauterive, C). |
Filing 4
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H.L. Perez-Montes on 10/7/2020. (crt,Tice, Y)
|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 10/5/2020. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 10/5/2020. (crt,Dauterive, C) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 9th JDC Parish of Rapides, Case Number 268663A (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4410349) filed by Dresser L L C, Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Andrew M Stakelum added to party Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew M Stakelum added to party Dresser L L C(pty:dft))(aty,Stakelum, Andrew) Modified text on 10/2/2020 (Dunford, T). |
| CASE Assigned to Judge David C Joseph and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Dunford, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
