Dukes v. Deville
| Ricardo K Dukes |
| Keith Deville |
| 1:2021cv00812 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| David C Joseph |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ricardo K Dukes - Because Dukes's Petition (ECF No. 6) is second and successive and Dukes has not received authorization from the Fifth Circuit, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Petition (ECF No. 1) be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, WITH PREJUDICE as to the jurisdictional issue, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the merits of Dukess claims. Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H.L. Perez-Montes on 5/18/2021. (crt,Tice, Y) (a) (Main Document 9 replaced on 5/18/2021 to reflect the correct ECF no. ) (Tice, Y). |
| Filing 8 EXHIBITS re #6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ricardo K Dukes. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Thomas, T) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM by Ricardo K Dukes. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Thomas, T) |
| Filing 6 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ricardo K Dukes. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(crt,Thomas, T) |
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit documents on approved forms. (Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 4/29/2021). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 3/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas 2254 Form)(crt,Reeves, T)
|
| FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Ricardo K Dukes in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 54635065483. (crt,Adams, K) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ricardo K Dukes. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Thomas, T) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 3/29/2021. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Ricardo K Dukes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 3/25/2021. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge David C Joseph and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ricardo K Dukes. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/29/2021) (Devillier, W). Petition not on approved form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dukes v. Deville | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ricardo K Dukes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Keith Deville | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
