Desselle v. Saul
Plaintiff: Katherine Desselle
Defendant: U S Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 1:2021cv02213
Filed: July 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Referring Judge: Joseph H L Perez-Montes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2021 Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. (crt,Reeves, T)
August 19, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed in Social Security Case by Katherine Desselle. Andrew M Saul served on 8/11/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service made upon: U S Attorney;U S Attorney General;Commissioner of SSA. (aty,Lemoine, Peter)
August 3, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to US Attorney, US Attorney General and Comm of Social Security. (crt,Taylor, L)
August 3, 2021 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT of Civil Case filing fee by Katherine Desselle. ( Filing Fee: $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4761949) . (aty,Lemoine, Peter)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 7/29/2021. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph)
July 29, 2021 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 7/29/2021. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph)
July 27, 2021 CASE Assigned to Judge Dee D Drell and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Whidden, C)
July 27, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Katherine Desselle. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #2 Proposed order)(aty,Lemoine, Peter)
July 27, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul (In Forma Pauperis status requested and/or granted) filed by Katherine Desselle. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Peter J Lemoine added to party Katherine Desselle(pty:pla))(aty,Lemoine, Peter) Modified on 7/28/2021 to correct defendant name (Whidden, C).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Desselle v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine Desselle
Represented By: Peter J Lemoine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U S Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?