Dardar v. LeBlanc et al
| Santos Dardar |
| James LeBlanc and Marcus Myer |
| 1:2021cv02284 |
| July 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| David C Joseph |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Clerk is directed to serve plaintiff with two summons forms and one USM 285 form for each defendant to be completed by plaintiff and returned to clerk for service by U S Marshal. (Forms attached.) Pro Se Response due by 10/21/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 9/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Service packet)(crt,Haik, K)
|
|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT adopting #5 Report and Recommendations ordered that damages against Warden Meyers in his official capacity only is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; all claims against Secretary James LeBlanc are DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and Plaintiffs request for release is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing a habeas corpus petition. Signed by Judge David C Joseph on 9/16/2021. (crt,Roaix, G)
|
| ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint, filed by Santos Dardar. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 9/15/2021. (crt,Roaix, G) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Santos Dardar. Response to Objection to R&R due by 9/28/2021 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS RECOMMENDED that Dardars claim for monetary damages against Warden Meyers in his official capacity only be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that all claims against Secretary LeBlanc be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Dardars request for release be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because such relief cannot be obtained through a 1983 Complaint. The remaining claims against Warden Meyer will be SERVED pursuant to a separate Order. Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 9/1/2021. (crt,Roaix, G)
|
| FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Santos Dardar in the amount of $402.00, receipt number 54635066152. (crt,Whitener, M) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. ( Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 9/7/2021). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 8/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(crt,Thomas, T)
|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 8/5/2021. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 8/4/2021. (crt,Taylor, L) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge David C Joseph and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Taylor, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James LeBlanc, Marcus Myer filed by Santos Dardar. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Whitener, M) Modified on 8/4/2021 - No filing fee (Taylor, L). Modified to remove deficiency notation on 8/23/2021 (Haik, K). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
