Mitchell et al v. Safeco Insurance Co of Oregon
| Darren A Mitchell and Shona Bryant Mitchell |
| Safeco Insurance Co of Oregon |
| 1:2021cv02390 |
| August 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| David C Joseph |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 8/11/2021. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Safeco Insurance Co of Oregon. (crt,Crick, S) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge David C Joseph and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Safeco Insurance Co of Oregon with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4767208) filed by Darren A Mitchell, Shona Bryant Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Joseph Muckleroy added to party Darren A Mitchell(pty:pla), Shona Bryant Mitchell(pty:pla))(aty,Muckleroy, Joseph) Modified on 8/10/2021 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
