Cambrice v. Messic-I-49 L L C
| Angie Cambrice |
| Messic-I-49, L.L.C. and Messic-I-49 L L C doing business as McDonalds |
| 1:2021cv03749 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Dee D Drell |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER No 1 for cases assigned to Judge Dee D Drell sent to counsel of record. (Plan of Work - Compliance Deadline set for 1/30/2022.)(crt,Roaix, G) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Enroll as Counsel. Added as counsel Brandon Trey Morris,Justin Carey Dewett,Joshua Lynn Powell,John Allen Davis,Meghan Marie Nolen for Angie Cambrice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 11/15/2001. (crt,Bunting, M)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for B. Trey Morris, Justin C. Dewett, Josh L. Powell, John A. Davis, Meghan M. Nolen to Enroll as Counsel by Angie Cambrice. Motions referred to Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Hancock, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Messic-I-49 L L C. (aty,Anseman, Norman) |
|
Filing 5
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H.L. Perez-Montes on 10/27/2021. (crt,Tice, Y)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 10/26/2021. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 10/25/2021. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Norman E Anseman, III on behalf of Messic-I-49 L L C. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 11/8/2021. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Judge Dee D Drell and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes added. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Messic-I-49 L L C. NO PDF ATTACHED - PDF of document can be found attached to #1 Notice of Removal, attachment #17, filed in the 10th JDC, Parish of Natchitoches on 9/17/2021.(crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 10th JDC Natchitoches Parish, Case Number C-92740 A with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4869206) filed by Messic-I-49, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Verification, #3 Certificate of Filing, #4 Exhibit A-Petition for Damages, #5 Exhibit B-Cover with Discovery, #6 Exhibit C-Pltf's Answers to ROGs, #7 Exhibit D-Ochsner LSU_Redacted, #8 Exhibit E-Orthopedic Specialists of LA_Redacted, #9 Exhibit F-MRI Results, #10 Exhibit G-FU Dr. Haynie, #11 Exhibit H-Surgical Records, #12 Exhibit I-Pltf's Responses to RFA, #13 List of Parties, #14 List of Pleadings, #15 Exhibit 1-Petition for Damages, #16 Exhibit 2-Affidavit of Long Arm Service, #17 Exhibit 3-Answer + Jury Bond Order, #18 Exhibit 4-Correspondence to Clerk Requesting Status Conference, #19 Exhibit 5-Mtn + Order for Status Conference)(Attorney Norman E Anseman, III added to party Messic-I-49, L.L.C.(pty:dft))(aty,Anseman, Norman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
