Frost v. Unknown Defendant
| Daniel Lee Frost |
| Unknown Defendant |
| 1:2022cv01262 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Dee D Drell |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 6/7/2022. (crt,Taylor, L)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Lee Frost. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Memorandum Order)(crt,Taylor, L) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Daniel Lee Frost. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Taylor, L) |
| Filing 6 CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT entitled filed by Daniel Lee Frost regarding #1 DEFICIENT Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Taylor, L) |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit documents on approved forms. Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. (Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 6/16/2022) Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 5/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus form, #2 In Forma Pauperis form)(crt,Devillier, W)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 5/16/2022. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 5/12/2022. (crt,Taylor, L) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from Plaintiff to Court submitting a copy of motion(s) filed in LA Supreme Court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit/Motion(s) to LA Supreme Court, #2 Envelope) (crt,Haik, K) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Dee D Drell and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Taylor, L) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Daniel Lee Frost. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(crt,Lemoine, N) Modified on 5/12/2022 - not on approved form (Taylor, L). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frost v. Unknown Defendant | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Frost | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unknown Defendant | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
