Collins v. Southern Fidelity Insurance Co
| Thomas Collins |
| Southern Fidelity Insurance Co |
| Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole |
| 1:2022cv04148 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Dee D Drell |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER staying cases filed by the McClenny, Moseley, and Associates Firm until further order of this Court. See PDF of order for more information. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 10/21/2022. (crt,Whidden, C)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Southern Fidelity Insurance Co. (crt,Miletello, A) |
|
Filing 2
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 8/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(crt,Miletello, A)
|
| CASE Assigned to Judge Dee D Drell and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5237777) filed by Thomas Collins. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Cameron Sean Snowden added to party Thomas Collins(pty:pla))(aty,Snowden, Cameron) Modified docket text on 9/4/2022 (Miletello, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
