Williams et al v. USA
| Mr. Kevin Ray Williams, Jr., Roni Ann Friou Williams and Kevin Ray Williams, Jr |
| USA |
| 1:2024cv00038 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Jerry Edwards |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H.L. Perez-Montes on 1/12/2024. (crt,Tice, Y) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to U S Attorney, U S Attorney General. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| CASE Assigned to District Judge Jerry Edwards, Jr and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against USA (Filing fee $405, receipt number ALAWDC-5820611) filed by Kevin Ray Williams, Jr, Roni Ann Friou Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Jeff David Easley added to party Kevin Ray Williams, Jr(pty:pla), Attorney Jeff David Easley added to party Roni Ann Friou Williams(pty:pla))(aty,Easley, Jeff) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
