Deville v. Sieveking et al
| John Deville, Jr |
| Johnny Sieveking, Kobe Lacombe, Jordan Santoyo, Chase Deville and Gage Juneau |
| 1:2024cv00197 |
| February 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit documents on approved forms. Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. (Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 3/21/2024). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 2/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 1983 Civil Rights form, #2 In Forma Pauperis form)(crt,Devillier, W)
|
| Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/15/2024. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT COMPLAINT against Chase Deville, Gage Juneau, Kobe Lacombe, Jordan Santoyo, Johnny Sieveking filed by John Deville, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Williams, G)). Complaint not on approved form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
