Chargois-El v. LeBlanc et al
| Kendell Joseph Chargois-El and Kendell Chargois |
| LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Marcus Myers and James M LeBlanc |
| 1:2024cv01264 |
| September 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 9/19/2024. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 2 DEFICIENT ? MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kendell Joseph Chargois-El. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 9/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Williams, G). Motion/Application not on approved form. |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT ? COMPLAINT against James M LeBlanc, LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Marcus Myers filed by Kendell Joseph Chargois-El. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Memorandum / Brief, #3 Envelope)(crt,Williams, G) Modified to edit text on 9/17/2024 (Devillier, W). Complaint not on approved form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
