Woodard v. Andrus
Case Number: 2:2003cv02098
Filed: November 13, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Lake Charles Office
Presiding Judge: James T Trimble
Presiding Judge: Alonzo P Wilson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 628 60 DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Sarah S Vance on 1/12/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(crt,Kennedy, T)
December 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 621 ORDER and REASONS denying 579 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge Sarah S Vance on 12/30/2010. (crt,Kennedy, T)
September 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 523 ORDER AND REASONS: In this case, plaintiffs federal constitutional claims havebeen dismissed, and the Court has ordered the parties to brief the issue of whether it should retain jurisdiction over plaintiffs state law claims. For the reasons herein, the Court will exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' state law claims. Signed by Judge Sarah S Vance on 9/10/2010. (crt,Alexander, E)
May 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 508 ORDER re 409 Amended Document filed by Doug Welborn, H Lynn Jones, II, Gary Loftin, Ronald L Nichols, Julian Dufreche, J G Dupont, Jr, Jon A Gegenheimer. Before the Court is defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on Due Process Notice (R. Doc. 409).1 For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Sarah S Vance on 5/12/10. (crt,Kennedy, T)
April 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 503 ORDER : Considering the record and the written submissions of counsel contained in the proposed discovery plan, IT IS ORDERED that each renewed Rule 30(b)(6) deposition is limited to no more than three (3) hours. As to defendants desire to take depos itions of plaintiffs counsel of record, they are reminded of the Fifth Circuits view that such depositions generally are disfavored. Nguyen v. Excel Corp., 197 F.3d 200, 209 (5th Cir. 1999). IT IS ORDERED that defendants must file a motion to compel any such depositions before they are noticed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the schedule of dates, times and locations of the depositions set out on pp. 3-4 of the proposed discovery plan is hereby adopted as the order of the court.. Signed by Joseph C Wilkinson, Jr on 4/27/10. (crt,Kennedy, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodard v. Andrus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?