v. Fidelity National Property & Casualty Insurance Co et al
| Patrick and Carissa Dennis |
| Fidelity National Property & Casualty Insurance Co and Lyons Insurance Inc |
| 2:2009cv01015 |
| June 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lake Charles Office |
| Calcasieu |
| Kathleen Kay |
| James T Trimble |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM RULING re 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Patrick Dennis. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Ruling, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment will be denied and defendant's motion for summary judgment will be g ranted to the extent that the court finds that the policy was not in effect when Hurricane Ike made landfall and thus, plaintiffs are not entitled to benefits pursuant to the SFIP. Defendant's motion will also be granted to the extent that plaintiffs' claims for state law extra-contractual claims will be dismissed. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on August 17, 2010. (crt,Benoit, T)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM RULING re 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lyons Insurance Inc. For reasons set forth this date, the motion will be granted dismissing this defendant with prejudice. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 03/25/10. (crt,Harrison, U)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
