OceanConnect.com Inc. v. M/V Fesco Angara
| OceanConnect.com Inc and OceanConnect U K Ltd |
| M/V Fesco Angara |
| 2:2009cv01694 |
| September 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lake Charles Office |
| Calcasieu |
| Kathleen Kay |
| James T Trimble |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 741 Shipping |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the 69 Motion for Reconsideration is hereby by GRANTED and the 67 Memorandum Ruling and 68 Judgment are hereby VACATED. However, there will be no extensions of time for any further discovery past the 6/ 24/2012 discovery deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall file no later than 7/24/2012 its opposition to 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs shall file their response no later than 8/7/2012 after which the court will again consider the motion for summary judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for oral argument (Rec. Doc. 70) is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 5/7/2012. (crt,Putch, A)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM RULING re 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by OceanConnect.com Inc, OceanConnect U K Ltd. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 1/26/12. (crt,Roaix, G)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM RULING re 35 MOTION to Dismiss, 41 MOTION for Oral Argument. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 10/7/2011. (crt,Putch, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
