Saltzman v. Rader et al

Plaintiff: Brian Saltzman
Defendant: Warden of Dixon Correctional Institute
Case Number: 2:2010cv01266
Filed: August 5, 2010
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Lake Charles Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 29, 2011 7 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendations, it is ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 6/28/11. (crt,Finn, P)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saltzman v. Rader et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Saltzman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden of Dixon Correctional Institute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?