Gatte et al v. Ready For A Change L L C et al
Tammy Gatte and Colby Gatte |
Judy Dohm, Ready 4 A Change L L C, Rafael Velasco Marin, Ezequiel Gamez Hinojosa, Hector Joaquin Perez Corzo, Guillermina Gamez and Clinica Victoria Hospital |
2:2011cv02083 |
December 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Lake Charles Office |
Calcasieu |
Kathleen Kay |
Patricia Minaldi |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 65 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 65 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 7/30/2015. (crt,FinnSld, P) |
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM RULING that the 45 MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by Colby Gatte, Tammy Gatte is DENIED; The court herein adopts in full the reasoning set forth in its prioer re 43 Memorandum Ruling. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 9/16/2013. (crt,Finn, P) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM RULING that the 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, Insufficient Service of Process and Failure to State a Claim filed by Judy Dohm, Ready 4 A Change L L C, will be granted; and that the 29 MOTION to Continue Hearing and Briefing Deadline on Defendants Motion to Dismiss to Allow Discovery with opposition filed by Colby Gatte, Tammy Gatte and the 36 MOTION for Discovery will be DENIED. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 1/7/2013. (crt,FinnSld, P) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.