Stacey Freeman v. Boise Cascade, et al

Plaintiff: Stacey Freeman
Defendant: Boise Cascade Wood Products L L C and Union Pacific Railroad Co
Case Number: 2:2013cv00305
Filed: February 8, 2013
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Lake Charles Office
County: Allen
Referring Judge: Kathleen Kay
Presiding Judge: Patricia Minaldi
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stacey Freeman v. Boise Cascade, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boise Cascade Wood Products L L C
Represented By: Andrew H Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co
Represented By: John E McElligott, Jr
Represented By: Kevin M Dills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Freeman
Represented By: Leslie R Leavoy, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?