Warner v. Aeroframe Services L L C et al
| Jenny Warner |
| Aeroframe Services L L C and Aviation Technical Services Inc |
| Roger A Porter |
| Aviation Technical Services Inc |
| Aeroframe Services L L C |
| Aviation Technical Services Inc |
| Roger A Porter |
| Aviation Technical Services Inc |
| 2:2014cv00983 |
| May 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lake Charles Office |
| Cameron |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Patricia Minaldi |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER re 99 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jenny Warner. On or before November 12, 2021, plaintiff is to amend her memorandum in support of her motion to set forth the amount claimed. The total amount is to be further broken down by amount for wages, for penalties, and for attorney fees only. The court will not do any math for plaintiff.The additional sum included in the affidavit is unsupported by any documentation and was notan item included for the Cooley matters so that we are able to simply refer to our ruling there tosubstantiate that award. We consider the time passed for this plaintiff to make such a claim forany additional sum and will suggest to the district court that claim be denied. Plaintiff will haveevery opportunity to object to that recommendation at the time it is issued. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 10/21/2021. (crt,Crick, S)
|
|
Filing
86
JUDGMENT in case 2:14-cv-00983-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00984-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00985-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00986-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00987-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00988-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00989-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00990-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00991-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00992-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02 323-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02324-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02325-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02538-DEW-KK; adopting (85) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00983-DEW-KK; (75) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00984-DEW-KK; (76) Report and Recommendations. i n case 2:14-cv-00985-DEW-KK; (80) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00986-DEW-KK; (81) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00987-DEW-KK; (75) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00988-DEW-KK; (68) Report and Recommendati ons. in case 2:14-cv-00989-DEW-KK; (67) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00990-DEW-KK; (74) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00991-DEW-KK; (312) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00992-DEW-KK; (62) Report and Recom mendations. in case 2:14-cv-02323-DEW-KK; (63) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-02324-DEW-KK; (64) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-02325-DEW-KK granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is rendered in favor of Aviation Technical Services ("ATS") and against all plaintiffs, Aeroframe Services L L C, ("Aeroframe") and Roger Porter dismissing all claims against A T S with prejudice. The motion is denied to the extent i t sought dismissal of plaintiffs' claims against Aeroframe. Upon reconsideration of the previous ruling in 2:14-cv-0992, doc 85, ruling at doc 104 and judgment at doc 105, and finding that the motion should now be GRANTED, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment be and it is hereby rendered in favor or Michael Ashford against Aeroframe Services L L C in the amount of $35,200. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 6/9/2021. (crt,Crick, S)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER to Clarify Procedural Posture and to Unconsolidate Cases. Once the cases have been unconsolidated, we will issue an order similar to that issued in Cooley for plaintiff-employees to file a Motion for Summary Judgment for their claims against Aeroframe or risk a recommendation to the district court that the claims be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 6/23/2021. (crt,Crick, S)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER adopting 73 Report and Recommendations. The initial denials of remand in this matter are now supplemented to include the reasons for denial in Ashford 2 as if those reasons and that judgment adopting the reasons were reproduced in this matter in their entirety. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 8/10/2020. (crt,Dauterive, C)
|
|
Filing
44
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 39 Report and Recommendations; denying 16 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 12 Motion to Remand; denying 12 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 14 Motion to Remand; denying 16 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 02/14/17. (crt,Tice, Y)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM RULING that the 7 MOTION to Consolidate Case with Case Number 14-984, 14-985, 14-986, 14-987, 14-988, 14-989, 14-990, 14-991, 14-992 with opposition filed by Aviation Technical Services Inc. be and hereby is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 24 MOTION to Amend/Correct be and hereby is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ATS is hereby granted leave to resubmit another motion requesting consolidation at such time as the Magistrate Judge has ruled on the pending motion to remand, provided that jurisdiction is not found to be lacking. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 9/29/2014. (crt,FinnSld, P)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
