Morgan v. Vannoy
Plaintiff: Jason Lamounte Morgan
Defendant: Darrell Vannoy
Case Number: 2:2016cv00265
Filed: February 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Lake Charles Office
County: West Feliciana
Presiding Judge: Kathleen Kay
Presiding Judge: Patricia Minaldi
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendations, and for reasons stated in the 16 Memorandum Ruling, IT IS ORDERED that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jason Lamounte Morgan is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on December 5, 2016. (crt,Benoit, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan v. Vannoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Lamounte Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darrell Vannoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?