Brand Energy Solutions L L C v. Gilley
| Brand Energy Solutions L L C |
| Cody Gilley |
| 2:2016cv01025 |
| July 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lake Charles Office |
| Calcasieu |
| Kathleen Kay |
| James T Trimble |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM RULING re 30 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Cody Gilley's First Amended Counterclaim filed by Brand Energy Solutions L L C. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 2/22/17. (crt,Roaix, G)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM RULING re 21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Cody Gilley. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 1/18/17. (crt,Roaix, G)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss. The motion is granted to the extent that the court finds the Absentees are indispensable parties which must be joined in this lawsuit. Plaintiff shall amend complaint to in clude the indispensable parties no later than thirty days from the date of this order; failure to comply will result in dismissal of the instant lawsuit; otherwise, the motion to dismiss the complaint is hereby denied. Oral argument currently scheduled for 10/26/206 is hereby canceled. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 10/14/2016. (crt,ThomasSld, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
