USA v. Kees et al
| USA |
| Bruce Kees, Chester Arthur Cormier and Brenda Sue Cormier |
| 2:2016cv01180 |
| August 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lake Charles Office |
| Calcasieu |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Patricia Minaldi |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
FINAL JUDGMENT denying 23 Motion to Set Aside Default, 18 Renewed Motion of the United States for Entry of Default Judgment against Bruce C Kees is granted, United States shall have judgment in its favor and against Bruce C Kees in the total amount of $401,356.74, and unpaid balances of two penalties in the total amount of $1,898.46, Subject Property to be sold. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 8/28/2019. (crt,JonesSld, P)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM RULING re 18 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Bruce C. Kees filed by USA. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 8/15/2019. (crt,Benoit, T)
|
|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT Adopting 13 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Denying 10 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. The motion is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to re-urge the motion if it can correct the deficiencies outlined in Magistrate Judge Kay's report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 9/18/2018. (crt,Crawford, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
