Prince v. Coca Cola Bottling Co United Inc
Plaintiff: Dwight S. Prince and Dwight S Prince
Defendant: Coca Cola Bottling Co United Inc
Case Number: 2:2018cv01076
Filed: August 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Lake Charles Office
County: Calcasieu
Presiding Judge: Terry A Doughty
Referring Judge: Kathleen Kay
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2018 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Dwight S Prince. Coca Cola Bottling Co United Inc waiver sent on 9/19/2018, answer due 11/19/2018. (aty,Hill, Dianne)
September 25, 2018 NOTICE of Corrective Action to Dianne L Hill on behalf of Dwight S Prince regarding Notice of Corrective Action. Action taken: Modified event to reflect issued in error. (crt,Bunting, M)
September 25, 2018 ISSUED IN ERROR - NOTICE of Corrective Action to Dianne L Hill on behalf of Dwight S Prince regarding #9 Request for Waiver of Service. Action taken: docket text modified to reflect Summons Returned Unexecuted - Service of the complaint is not considered properly executed (signed Waiver of Services not attached to docket entry); therefore answer deadline has been terminated and service executed date removed. (crt,Bunting, M) Modified to reflect issued in error on 9/25/2018 (Bunting, M).
September 24, 2018 Filing 9 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to CT Corp system on 09-21-2018 by Dwight S Prince. Waiver of Service due by 10/24/2018. (aty,Hill, Dianne)
September 17, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Coca Cola Bottling Co United Inc (crt,Finn, P)
September 17, 2018 FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Dwight S Prince in the amount of $400.00, receipt number 24635002562. (crt,Finn, P)
September 10, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Deficiency to Dianne L Hill on behalf of Dwight S Prince regarding #1 Complaint. Reason: IFP Denied and filing fee not paid. (crt,Reeves, T)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER re #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff states that he currently pays living expenses from "loans against my 401K" but fails to list the 401(k) as an asset. Accordingly the motion is again denied and will continue to be denied until the court is satisfied that it has received full information about the assets, debts, and income of this plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 9/6/2018. (jud,Kay, Kathleen)
September 5, 2018 Filing 5 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dwight S Prince. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Amended, #2 Memorandum / Brief, #3 Proposed order)(aty,Hill, Dianne)
August 30, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency to Dianne L Hill on behalf of Dwight S Prince regarding #1 Complaint. Reason: IFP Denied and filing fee not paid. (crt,Reeves, T)
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis at this time. Plaintiff lists zero income yet lists expenses and does not explain how these expenses are met. Further the information provided in Attachment 1 to Document 2 indicates plaintiff is purchasing a home but fails to list a home as an asset. In short we find the affidavit incomplete and therefore the request is denied without prejudice to plaintiff's right to reassert with additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 8/28/2018. (jud,Kay, Kathleen)
August 20, 2018 CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,FinnSld, P)
August 20, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dwight S. Prince. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Financial Info, #2 Memorandum / Brief, #3 Proposed order)(aty,Hill, Dianne)
August 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coca Cola Bottling Co United Inc with Jury Demand (In Forma Pauperis status requested and/or granted) filed by Dwight S. Prince. (Attachments: #1 Right to Sue Letter, #2 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Dianne L Hill added to party Dwight S. Prince(pty:pla))(aty,Hill, Dianne) Modified on 8/21/2018 to edit text (FinnSld, P). Modified on 9/10/2018 to reflect deficient? status as IFP denied again (Reeves, T). Modified on 9/17/2018 to remove deficiency, Fee Paid (Finn, P).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prince v. Coca Cola Bottling Co United Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dwight S. Prince
Represented By: Dianne L Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dwight S Prince
Represented By: Dianne L Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coca Cola Bottling Co United Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?