Kapordelis v. Warden
Plaintiff: Gregory C Kapordelis
Defendant: Warden
Case Number: 2:2018cv01092
Filed: August 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Terry A Doughty
Referring Judge: Kathleen Kay
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2018 Filing 5 JUDGMENT Granting #4 Voluntary Motion to Dismiss. This matter is Dismissed Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 9/18/2018. (crt,Crawford, A)
September 18, 2018 Motions Transferred regarding #4 JOINT/VOLUNTARY MOTION to Dismiss. Motions referred to Judge Terry A Doughty. (crt,Benoit, T)
September 18, 2018 CASE Reassigned to Judge Terry A Doughty. Unassigned District Judge no longer assigned to the case. Administrative Entry due to Judgment and for statistical purposes. (crt,Crawford, A)
September 17, 2018 Filing 4 JOINT/VOLUNTARY MOTION to Dismiss by Gregory C Kapordelis. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Clerk is directed to serve plaintiff with two summons forms and one USM 285 form for the United States Attorney for the WesternDistrict of Louisiana, the United States through the United States Attorney General, and the Warden of FCIO to be completed by plaintiff and returned to clerk for service by U S Marshal and Certified Mail. Plaintiff is also directed to submit his complaint on the proper forms for bringing a Bivens complaint. Clerk manually noticed order with 6 summons forms, 3 USM 285 forms, a blank Bivens complaint form and a blank IFP application on 8/29/18. (Pro Se Response due by 9/28/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 8/29/2018. (crt,Haik, K)
August 27, 2018 FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Gregory C Kapordelis in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 54635059759. (crt,Adams, K)
August 23, 2018 Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Thigpen, M)
August 22, 2018 CASE Assigned to Unassigned District Judge and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Thigpen, M)
August 22, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY as relief sought included within pdf of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. by Gregory C Kapordelis. (crt,Miletello, A) Modified on 8/22/2018 to assign document number (Miletello, A).
August 22, 2018 Filing 1 DEFICIENT PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gregory C Kapordelis. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) Complaint not on approved forms.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kapordelis v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory C Kapordelis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?