Cruz v. USA
| Richard Cruz |
| USA |
| 2:2018cv01649 |
| December 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER denying #8 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 2/12/2019. (crt,WalkerSld, B)
|
| USCA Case Number 19-30074 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Richard Cruz. (crt,WalkerSld, B) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Deficiency to Richard Cruz regarding #8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal and #11 Corrective Document. Reason: Does not include a certified copy of the applicants prison trust fund account showing at least the past six months transactions. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
| Filing 11 CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT entitled Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal filed by Richard Cruz regarding #8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
| Filing 10 LETTER from Richard Cruz to Clerk re #7 Notice of Appeal for certified record on appeal. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY: Appeals Clerk returned a letter indicating that the request is premature. The 5th Circuit has not ordered the District Court to create a ROA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Clerk Letter) (crt,WalkerSld, B) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Deficiency to Richard Cruz regarding #8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. Reason: Does not contain signatures of prison account officer and does not include a copy of the applicants prison trust fund account showing at least the past six months transactions. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 Attachment)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
| Filing 8 DEFICIENT MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal by Richard Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,WalkerSld, B) Modified on 2/12/2019 to remove ? notation - motion has been ruled on, see Order Doc #13 (WalkerSld, B). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Judgment re Report and Recommendations, Order on Report and Recommendations by Richard Cruz. FEE STATUS: NOT PAID (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT adopting #2 Report and Recommendation Denying and Dismissing With Prejudice #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard Cruz. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 2/1/2019. (crt,Crawford, A) |
| CASE Reassigned to Duty Judge Terry A Doughty. Unassigned District Judge no longer assigned to the case. Administrative Entry due to Judgment and for statistical purposes. (crt,Crawford, A) |
| Motions Transferred regarding #8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. Motions referred to Judge Terry A Doughty. (crt,WalkerSld, B) |
| Motions Transferred regarding #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard Cruz. Motions referred to Judge Terry A Doughty. (crt,Benoit, T) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #4 Motion for Reconsideration re #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard Cruz. Nothing presented in this motion has given the court cause to reconsider its recommendation on the matter. Petitioner's motion may instead be construed as his objections to the district judge of our report and recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 1/22/2019. (jud,Kay, Kathleen)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Reconsideration/MOTION for Rehearing re #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard Cruz by Richard Cruz. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 3 OBJECTION to #2 Report and Recommendations by Richard Cruz. Response to Objection to R&R due by 1/29/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard Cruz. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Objections to R&R due by 1/22/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 1/7/2019. (crt,LaCombe, L) |
| CASE Assigned to Unassigned District Judge and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt number 54635060689, filing fee $5) filed by Richard Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cruz v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Cruz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
