Reeves v. Mancuso et al
| Shannon Reeves |
| Warden Scot Nugent, Unknown Officers, Sheriff Tony Mancuso, Scot Nugent and Tony Mancuso |
| 2:2019cv00725 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| James D Cain |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 JUDGMENT that the #7 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 7/24/2019. (crt,JonesSld, P) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM RULING DENYING #7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to 12(b)(6) and or 56 of FRCP MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tony Mancuso, Scot Nugent. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 7/24/2019. (crt,JonesSld, P) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Claims of Plaintiff Pursuant to 12(b)(6) and or 56 of FRCP MOTION for Summary Judgment Response to Opposition of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and/or 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Tony Mancuso, Scot Nugent. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit One, in globo (Affidavit and certified records))(aty,McCorquodale, Robert) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim . (Attachments: #1 Statement of material facts)(aty,Burgess, L) Modified to edit docket text and correct docket entry relationship on 7/18/2019 (ThomasSld, T). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Deficiency to L Clayton Burgess on behalf of Shannon Reeves regarding #11 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion. Reason: No statement of material facts accompanied this opposition to motion for summary judgment. Please see LR56.2 for instructions regarding statements of material fact. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
| Filing 11 DEFICIENT MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Claims of Plaintiff Pursuant to 12(b)(6) and or 56 of FRCP MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Shannon Reeves. (aty,Burgess, L) Modified to reflect deficient status on 7/17/2019 (ThomasSld, T). Modified to indicate document corrected and resubmitted in its entirety as document #13 on 7/18/2019 (ThomasSld, T). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion Setting without oral argument regarding: #7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Claims of Plaintiff Pursuant to 12(b)(6) and or 56 of FRCP, MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion day set for 8/28/2019 before Judge James D Cain Jr. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
| Filing 9 CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT entitled Statement of Uncontested Material Facts filed by Tony Mancuso, Scot Nugent regarding #7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Claims of Plaintiff Pursuant to 12(b)(6) and or 56 of FRCP MOTION for Summary Judgment . (aty,McCorquodale, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Deficiency to Robert C McCorquodale on behalf of Tony Mancuso, Scot Nugent regarding #7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Claims of Plaintiff Pursuant to 12(b)(6) and or 56 of FRCP, MOTION for Summary Judgment. Reason: No statement of material facts accompanied this motion for summary judgment. Please see LR56.1 for instructions regarding statements of material fact. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Claims of Plaintiff Pursuant to 12(b)(6) and or 56 of FRCP by Tony Mancuso, Scot Nugent. Motions referred to Kathleen Kay. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, in globo, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Proposed order)(Attorney Robert C McCorquodale added to party Tony Mancuso(pty:dft), Attorney Robert C McCorquodale added to party Scot Nugent(pty:dft))(aty,McCorquodale, Robert) Modified to remove duplicate docket text and reflect deficient status on 7/3/2019 (ThomasSld, T). Added MOTION for Summary Judgment on 7/3/2019 (ThomasSld, T). Modified to remove deficient status on 7/9/2019 (ThomasSld, T). |
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER: This matter is hereby reassigned. Case reassigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr. Judge Foote no longer assigned to case. Any pending motions and deadlines or hearings previously set before Judge Foote are hereby reset before Judge Cain. All future filings should bear the name of the new judge assignment. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E. Foote.(crt,Benoit, T)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shannon Reeves. Unknown Officers served on 6/18/2019, answer due 7/09/2019. (aty,Burgess, L) Modified to correct service date and answer due date on 6/24/2019 (ThomasSld, T). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shannon Reeves. Tony Mancuso served on 6/18/2019, answer due 7/09/2019. (aty,Burgess, L) Modified to correct service date and answer due date on 6/24/2019 (ThomasSld, T). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shannon Reeves. Scot Nugent served on 6/18/2019, answer due 7/09/2019. (aty,Burgess, L) Modified to correcet service date and answer due date on 6/24/2019 (ThomasSld, T). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tony Mancuso, Scot Nugent, Unknown Officers. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tony Mancuso, Scot Nugent, Unknown Officers with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-3967935) filed by Shannon Reeves. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney L Clayton Burgess added to party Shannon Reeves(pty:pla))(aty,Burgess, L) Modified to edit docket text on 6/10/2019 (ThomasSld, T). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
