Okeayainneh v. Myers et al
| Julian Okeayainneh |
| R Myers, Hugh J Hurwitz and Dr Kathleen Hawk Sawyer |
| 2:2019cv01052 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| James D Cain |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Julian Okeayainneh in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 54635062478. (crt,Adams, K) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Julian Okeayainneh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #3 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 9/17/2019. (jud,Kay, Kathleen)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Julian Okeayainneh. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (Attachments: #1 Proposed pleading, #2 Proposed exhibits, #3 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT COMPLAINT against Hugh J Hurwitz, R Myers filed by Julian Okeayainneh. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A)./ Complaint not on approved forms. |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
