Breaux et al v. HomeFirst Agency Inc et al
| Dylan Ray Breaux and Hannah Breaux |
| Patrick Kasson, Derek Laviolette, Nelson Rene Morgan, HomeFirst Agency Inc, O B Morgan, Derek A Laviolette and Derek A Lavolette |
| 2:2020cv00168 |
| February 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| James D Cain |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by HomeFirst Agency Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7)(aty,Domingue, Lamont) Modified on 3/31/2020 to modify docket text (MiletelloSld, A). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #8 MOTION to Remand . Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Dylan Ray Breaux, Hannah Breaux. Motions referred to Kathleen Kay. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Proposed order, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit 1,#5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Exhibit 6, #10 Exhibit 7, #11 Exhibit 8, #12 Exhibit 9)(aty,Fazzio, Anthony) Modified on 3/10/2020 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
| Filing 7 STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. Patrick Kasson answer due 2/13/2020; Derek A Laviolette answer due 2/13/2020; O B Morgan answer due 2/13/2020. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY as summons returned executed contained within pdf of 7 Response to Removal Order. (crt,Crick, S) Modified on 2/28/2020 to add document number. (Crick, S). |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by HomeFirst Agency Inc identifying Corporate Parent C M H Capital Inc, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway Inc for HomeFirst Agency Inc. (aty,Domingue, Lamont) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by HomeFirst Agency Inc.(aty,Domingue, Lamont) |
Filing 4
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 2/11/2020. (crt,LaCombe, L)
|
| Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Mitchell, P) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Lamont P Domingue on behalf of HomeFirst Agency Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 2/24/2020. (crt,Mitchell, P) |
| STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. HomeFirst Agency Inc answer due 2/13/2020. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY: There is no PDF image with this entry. The PDF image can be found in Attachment #1 to Document #1 , Notice of Removal. (crt,Mitchell, P) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Mitchell, P) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 31st JDC Jefferson Davis Parish, Case Number C-784-19 (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4175243) filed by HomeFirst Agency Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Declaration of Andy Bruner, #2 Exhibit 2 Declaration of Laviolette, Morgan & Kasson, #3 Exhibit 3 State Court Petition, #4 Exhibit 4 Notice of Removal to State Court & Counsel, #5 Exhibit 5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit 6 Counsel List, #7 Exhibit 7 Verification)(Attorney Lamont P Domingue added to party HomeFirst Agency Inc(pty:dft))(aty,Domingue, Lamont) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
