Mystic Marketing Associates L L C et al v. Palomar Specialty Insurance Co
| Wyndell Financial, LLC and Mystic Marketing Associates, LLC |
| Palomar Specialty Insurance Company |
| 2:2020cv00550 |
| May 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| James D Cain |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Mystic Marketing Associates L L C, Wyndell Financial L L C. (aty,Venezia, John) Modified on 5/1/2020 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). (Main Document 3 replaced on 5/1/2020 with nonfillable form.) (Crick, S). |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mystic Marketing Associates L L C, Wyndell Financial L L C. (aty,Venezia, John) Modified on 5/1/2020 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Palomar Specialty Insurance Co with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4251723) filed by Mystic Marketing Associates L L C, Wyndell Financial L L C.(Attorney John Armand Venezia added to party Mystic Marketing Associates L L C(pty:pla),Wyndell Financial L L C(pty:pla))(aty,Venezia, John) Modified on 5/1/2020 to modify docket text.(Crick, S). |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Crick, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
