Holden v. Daniyarov et al
| Tyler Holden |
| G E I C O General Insurance Co, G E I C O Casualty Co, B E K Express L L C, American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc, Uktam Daniyarov and G E I C O Indemnity Co |
| 2:2021cv00227 |
| January 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Kathleen Kay |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Tyler Holden. (aty,Lemoine, Steven) |
| Filing 11 EXHIBIT re #10 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Remand by American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc. (aty,Truitt, Jack) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc. (aty,Truitt, Jack) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc . (aty,Truitt, Jack) |
Filing 8
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 2/9/2021. (crt,LaCombe, L)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #6 MOTION to Remand . Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by Tyler Holden. Motions referred to Kathleen Kay. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief)(aty,Lemoine, Steven) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc. (aty,Truitt, Jack) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 1/28/2021. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Jack Etherton Truitt on behalf of American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 2/11/2021. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc. (14th JDC, Parish of Calcasieu, #2020-3601, filed 1/8/2021 - PDF of this document is attached to #1 Notice of Removal, attachment 4).(crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal of American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. from 14th JDC Calcasieu Parish, Case Number 2020-3601, "D" with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4552893) filed by American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Affidavit, #3 Affidavit, #4 Exhibit "A" State Court Record, #5 Exhibit "B" Citations/Service Info, #6 Exhibit "C" Requests for Admission and Responses to Requests for Admissions)(Attorney Jack Etherton Truitt added to party American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(aty,Truitt, Jack) |
| Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay added. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc answer due 2/4/2021; G E I C O Casualty Co answer due 2/4/2021; G E I C O General Insurance Co answer due 2/4/2021; G E I C O Indemnity Co answer due 2/4/2021. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
