Byrd v. Marshland Foods L L C
| Lillian Byrd |
| Marshland Foods, LLC and Marshland Foods L L C |
| 2:2021cv01704 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| James D Cain |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Lillian Byrd. Marshland Foods L L C waiver sent on 6/22/2021, answer due 8/23/2021. (aty,Sudduth, James) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Marshland Foods L L C. (crt,Jones, P) |
| REMARK: A duplicate charge was incurred during the filing of the #1 Complaint. A refund of the initial payment of $402.00, ALAWDC-4708643, has been processed in pay.gov this date. Counsel is advised to verify the refund on their statement. (crt,McInnis, S) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Jones, P) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marshland Foods L L C with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number BLAWDC-4708643) filed by Lillian Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Affidavit Plaintiff Verification, #3 Exhibit A - Charge of Discrimination)(Attorney James Edward Sudduth, III added to party Lillian Byrd(pty:pla))(aty,Sudduth, James) Modified on 6/17/2021 to edit text (Jones, P). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
