Abbott v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
| William R Abbott |
| U S Bureau of Prisons, Shelly Power, Loretta Otis-Sanders and Sheila Lyons |
| 2:2021cv03774 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| REMARK: FEEDUE flag cleared. Filing fee was paid in District of Columbia. (crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST via phone call from Carlton Thompson on behalf of William Abbot for copy of doc #6 and docket sheet. Clerk mailed emailed copies of requested documents on 11/15/2021. (Public entry, but no electronic notice.) (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 11/5/2021. (crt,Taylor, L)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/2/2021.), Motions Transferred regarding #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William R Abbott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Cover letter, #3 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/3/2021: #4 Proposed order) (Haik, K). |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT CASE transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:21-cv-02492. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received |
|
Filing 7
TRANSFER ORDER- denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/12/2021. (See order for details) (znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.]
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by WILLIAM R. ABBOTT.(znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Western District of Louisiana. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 10/25/2021. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/05/2021. (znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.]
|
| Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number: 200714. (znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.] |
| Filing 4 Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by WILLIAM R. ABBOTT (znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.] |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by WILLIAM R. ABBOTT (znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WILLIAM R. ABBOTT. (znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by WILLIAM R. ABBOTT. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit)(znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.] |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 09/22/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 10/26/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
