Higginbotham v. Recon Management Services Inc
| Lloyd Higginbotham |
| Recon Management Services Inc |
| 2:2022cv00084 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| James D Cain |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL Pursuant to the Parties Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 2/24/2022. (crt,Guidry, C) |
| Filing 3 JOINT/VOLUNTARY MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice by Lloyd Higginbotham, Recon Management Services Inc. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(Attorney Richard M Schreiber added to party Lloyd Higginbotham(pty:pla))(aty,Schreiber, Richard) Modified on 2/23/2022 to add filer. (Alexander, E) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Recon Management Services Inc. (crt,Jones, P) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Jones, P) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Recon Management Services Inc with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4954913) filed by Lloyd Higginbotham. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Kenneth W DeJean added to party Lloyd Higginbotham(pty:pla))(aty,DeJean, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
