Lavergne v. Social Security et al
Commissioner of Social Security |
ZADA ORELIA LAVERGNE |
2:2022cv01436 |
May 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
James D Cain |
Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to US Attorney, US Attorney General and Comm of Social Security. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 6/6/2022. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY issued by the Clerk. In accordance with Standing Order 1.62, this matter is hereby reassigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay no longer assigned to case. All future filings should bear the name of the new judge assignment. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Reeves, T) |
Filing 4 ORDER: This matter was assigned the judicial officers as indicated above. However, due to the administrative error of the Clerk, it requires reassignment of the district and magistrate judges. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is referred to the Chief Judge for reassignment.. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 6/1/2022. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED ORDER re Case Assigned/Reassigned Referred to Judge James D Cain, Jr. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 5/31/2022. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Zada Orelia Lavergne. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY as pleading electronically filed as attachment #1 Proposed pleading pauper motion, to #1 Complaint. Counsel is reminded that multiple pleadings should not be combined into one document but should be filed separately. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 5/27/2022. (crt,Chavis, J) Modified to add document number on 5/31/2022 (Chavis, J). |
CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (In Forma Pauperis status requested and/or granted) filed by ZADA ORELIA LAVERGNE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed pleading pauper motion, #2 Proposed order)(Attorney Larry E Pichon added to party ZADA ORELIA LAVERGNE(pty:pet))(aty,Pichon, Larry) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/31/2022) (Chavis, J). (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/3/2022) (Chavis, J). (Attachment 2 replaced on 6/3/2022) (Chavis, J). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lavergne v. Social Security et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: ZADA ORELIA LAVERGNE | |
Represented By: | Larry E Pichon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.