Christiansen et al v. U S A A Casualty Insurance Co
Thomas R. Christiansen, Robyn L. Christiansen, Thomas R Christiansen and Robyn L Christiansen |
USAA Casualty Insurance Company and U S A A Casualty Insurance Co |
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole |
2:2022cv05061 |
August 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
James D Cain |
Kathleen Kay |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas R Christiansen, Robyn L Christiansen. U S A A Casualty Insurance Co served on 9/27/2022, answer due 10/18/2022. (aty,Roach, Brooke) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to U S A A Casualty Insurance Co. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 12/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(crt,Crick, S) |
CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USAA Casualty Insurance Company (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5245651) filed by Thomas R. Christiansen, Robyn L. Christiansen. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Brooke A Roach added to party Robyn L. Christiansen(pty:pla), Attorney Brooke A Roach added to party Thomas R. Christiansen(pty:pla))(aty,Roach, Brooke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.