Southland Investors L L C v. Lexington Insurance Co
Southland Investors, LLC and Southland Investors L L C |
Lexington Insurance Co |
2:2022cv06098 |
November 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
James D Cain |
Kathleen Kay |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion Setting without oral argument regarding: #10 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Claims under La. R.S. 22:1973 and Open-Ended Allegations. Motions referred to Judge James D Cain, Jr. Motion day set for 2/22/2023 before Judge James D Cain Jr. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Claims under La. R.S. 22:1973 and Open-Ended Allegations by Lexington Insurance Co. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief)(aty,Emmerling, Victoria) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Lexington Insurance Co answer due 1/19/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 12/21/2022. (crt,Jones, P) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lexington Insurance Co identifying Corporate Parent American International Group, Inc., Corporate Parent AIG Property Casualty U.S., Inc., Corporate Parent AIG Property Casualty Inc., for Lexington Insurance Co. (aty,Emmerling, Victoria) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer sent to Victoria Elizabeth Emmerling on behalf of Lexington Insurance Co. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 1/3/2023. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with consent by Lexington Insurance Co. Motions referred to Kathleen Kay. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(Attorney Victoria Elizabeth Emmerling added to party Lexington Insurance Co(pty:dft))(aty,Emmerling, Victoria) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Southland Investors L L C. Lexington Insurance Co served on 12/5/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (aty,Bice, Jere) Modified on 12/14/2022 to correct service and answer deadlines as an erroneous service date was entered at time of filing (Miletello, A). |
NOTICE of Corrective Action to Jere Jay Bice on behalf of Southland Investors L L C regarding #5 Summons Returned Executed. Action taken: Docket text modified to reflect correct service date of 12/5/2022 and answer due date of 12/27/2022 as an incorrect service date was entered at the time of filing. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Southland Investors L L C. (aty,Bice, Jere) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Complaint, sent to Jere Jay Bice on behalf of Southland Investors L L C. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 12/15/2022. (crt,Whitener, M) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lexington Insurance Co. (crt,Whitener, M) |
CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Whitener, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lexington Insurance Co with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5382514) filed by Southland Investors L L C. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Jere Jay Bice added to party Southland Investors, LLC(pty:pla))(aty,Bice, Jere) Modified docket text on 12/1/2022 (Whitener, M). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.