Follis v. Louisiana Workforce L L C et al
Matthew Follis |
Louisiana Workforce L L C, Johnny Smith, Mike Koffman, Major Propst, Ms Smith and Jane Doe |
2:2023cv00376 |
March 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
James D Cain |
Kathleen Kay |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. No initial filing fee due. Further ordered that plaintiff make payments of 20 percent of income for preceding month until $350.00 has been paid in full. Clerk manually noticed Prison Accounts Officer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 3/27/2023. (crt,Devillier, W) |
CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Devillier, W) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Follis. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 3/23/2023. (crt,Breite, S) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/24/2023: #1 Proposed order) (Devillier, W). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mike Koffman, Louisiana Workforce L L C, Propst, Smith, Johnny Smith with Jury Demand filed by Matthew Follis. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Breite, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.